lokasce.blogg.se - Mac with windows 10 more stable

MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE MAC OS X
MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE UPGRADE
MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE SOFTWARE
MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE MAC

MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE MAC

Stability is hard to prognosticate - even if you have all the crash data that is sent to Apple or by harvesting the logs of thousands of Mac computers.

MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE MAC OS X

So what is the general consensus on the overall system stability of Mac OS X 10.10.5 (Yosemite)? Past any of that I might fire up Handbrake or use others similar media conversion tools, but I doubt those would fall victim to-or cause-any system stability issue.FWIW, iTunes crashes like crazy nowadays, but I know that is most likely just iTune.

MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE SOFTWARE

And of course I use some of the standard Mac OS X built-in software such as Safari, Mail, iTunes and iPhoto.In Mac OS X I use Apple’s command line development tools for tool compiling in Bash.I use VirtualBox far more for my tasks mainly running simple, non-GUI Linux server instances.Instead of Photoshop, I use GraphicConvertor and Pixelmator for photo editing.Instead of Microsoft Office, I use Libre Office for it’s word processing and spreadsheet functionality, but maybe once a week.I don’t use any Adobe or Microsoft products and mainly use my Mac for Linux/Unix systems administration and web development tasks.

Storage: 500GB SATA hard disk drive about 40GB used.

Maybe one or two oddball kernel panic over the years, but nothing too bad. Using Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks) on my Mac Mini (Late 2012) and I have pretty much never experienced random crashes or failures so server I need to hard reboot the system. Basically when Mac OS X 10.10 (Yosemite) there seemed to be tons of reports of system crashes and required reboots for recovery and that’s not what I’m used to in an OS. I am one of those users out there who is still using Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks) mainly for overall system stability and performance. I would like to think that the 10.10.5 is more stable than the initial 10.10 release.

MAC WITH WINDOWS 10 MORE STABLE UPGRADE

Since I have stayed on Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks) for overall system stability, do I risk losing that stability with an upgrade to Mac OS X 10.10.5 (Yosemite)? If I have to trade stability for “newness” I’m not into an upgrade just yet but would like to hear some real-world information from people who might have been in the same boat as me. But I am considering an upgrade to Yosemite to the 10.10.5 version to at least be a part of the “more modern” world I want to stay stable but not too far behind the OS support curve. Now with Mac OS X 10.11 (El Capitan) out I am not too hot on getting into that version of the OS too quickly since I no longer trust Apple’s initial major version releases and am wary of SIP (System Integrity Protection) for now. Similar details on the Yosemite project page on Engadget as well. My time force quitting, re-starting, re-installing on a daily/hourlyīasis" and GeeboH calls Yosemite "the most unstable version of OS

Yosemite." Sydneystufff said, "I have wasted countless hours of

Windows Vista was "fundamentally more stable and reliable than Performance in benchmarks than Mavericks," commenting that even In performance, Yosemite didn't shine either, with altergeistĬomplaining of "GPU panics, hard crashes, freezes and lower For example, this Engadget post kvetches about Yosemite stability issues to no end: I don’t want to reboot or deal with crashes from Mac OS X or a Linux machine.įrom what I have read, heard and seen about Mac OS X 10.10 (Yosemite) it had issues with random crashes and memory leaks so I avoided it. I am using Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks) and have stayed on it mainly due to overall system stability.